The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart.

EconForeThought 2010:
PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: Double Major (B.S. Managerial Economics & B.S. Viticulture & Enology) from an Average UC (dare you to guess...)
Undergrad GPA: 3.36/4
Type of Grad: N/A
Grad GPA: N/A
GRE: 780Q, 520V, 4.5AWA
Math Courses: Calculus I-III, Linear Algebra, Adv Calc (RA I), 3 Stats courses
Econ Courses: Intro to Macro, Intro to Macro, Int Macro/Micro, Marketing, Metrics, Optimization, Production Management, Real Estate Econ, Econ Sustainability, Finance I,II, Accounting I,II,
Letters of Recommendation: <3>
Research Experience:
Geology research, Wine sensory RA
Teaching Experience:
None
Research Interests: Ag, Resource, I/O, Applied Micro... etc
SOP: Standard
RESULTS:
Attending: UC Berkeley ARE
Acceptances: NCSU Econ, U Wisconsin AAE, UC Davis ARE (M.S.),
Waitlist: <>
Rejections: UC Davis ARE PhD
What would you have done differently?
Well, I guess I would have decided earlier that Med School is not for me. I was good at math, struggled in chemistry, but still thought I could put a square peg in a round hole. This dropped my GPA. Realized late that econ was my calling, but I am not my any means disappointed-- I got into my dream school! This has been a fascinating process, and I can't wait to start the next chapter in my academic career.

good_tea 2010:
PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: BA, Joint Econ/Math at Top 30 Econ department (I am an international student, though)
Undergrad GPA: 3.83/4.00
GRE: 760Q/670V/4.5A
Math Courses: Calculus (B, B, A), Linear Algebra (B+), Differential Equations (A), Analysis (A,A), Operations Research (A), MA Statistics in economics department (A).
Econ Courses: Intermediate Micro (A), Intermediate Macro (B), Econometrics (A), Economics of Information (B+), MA Micro (A), MA Macro (A), and many electives (As).
Letters of Recommendation: One famous economics prof., wrote term paper (not sure about strength of the letter but not bad), one somewhat famous economics prof., senior thesis advisor (should have been quite solid), one analysis professor (should have been very good).
Research Experience: Senior thesis.
Teaching Experience: None.
Research Interests: Development, trade.
SOP: Nothing special.
Other: Had been working for an international organisation for a few months during the time of application.
RESULTS:
Acceptances: Cornell AEM MS (no $), UVA (wl-$), UMD AREC ($$), Michigan (no $), BU (wl-$).
Rejections: Yale, Harvard KSG, UCB ARE, Princeton, PSU, UMD, Brown, NYU, UCSD.
What would you have done differently?
I am very happy with my outcome but realise that with a bit of bad luck, it could have been a lot worse. I am answering this question not so much in retrospect but in terms of how my a priori thinking/information could have been better (e.g. in retrospect it wouldn't make sense to apply to Princeton but a priori it was reasonable to do so just in case my recommendation letters were extremely strong).
1. I would not have applied to Maryland Economics b/c it really didn't match my interests very well. I would not have applied to Cornell AEM b/c it turns out it is very difficult to get admitted directly into the PhD program and I didn't want to do a MA/MS. I might have applied to Cornell's economics instead, though. I would have applied to at least one more place outside the top-20, maybe University of Washington.
2. A higher GRE score would have been good but I tried and didn't manage (canceled my score after taking it the second time), so it is not something I regret. I am not so good at that kind of test.
3. In terms of the longer run, I should have considered how I could do better in math classes earlier on. I am naturally quite good at math but had been doing only ok since late high school and never really thought about how I could improve. I learned (while studying for my Linear Algebra final exam, which took my grade for that class from a B- to a B+), that it is very useful to study by writing/typing out explanations to make sure one understands everything properly. Studying in this way, I did very well in all my subsequent math classes.

econsailorgirl 2010:
PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: Economics Major, mid-size public university
Undergrad GPA: 3.9/4 overall
Type of Grad: n/a
GRE: 790Q, 710V, 5.0AWA
Math Courses: Single and Multi-variable Calculus, Linear Algebra I and II, Probability and Statistics
Econ Courses: Intermediate Micro/Macro, Advanced Micro, many applied micro courses (Environmental, Health, etc.), Econometrics, Economy History, Experimental Econ, Game Theory
Other coursework: Many courses in Environmental Sciences/Studies and Geology
Letters of Recommendation: 1 well-known Berkeley ARE, 1 other Berkeley ARE, 1 UWashington
Statement of Purpose: Research interests, interest in Economics in general, how each program fit with my interests
Research Experience: Very little formal--mostly through coursework
Teaching Experience: Economics tutor, environmental educator
Research Interests: primarily agriculture and development, but also environmental
RESULTS:
Acceptances: U. of Rhode Island ENRE ($$), UC Davis ARE ($$), UMD AREC (wl$), U. Wisconsin AAE (wl$),
Waitlists: Johns Hopkins Health Econ and Policy
Rejections: UC Berkeley ARE, Harvard Econ, Duke Econ
Attending: UC Davis
What would you have done differently?
I feel very good about the outcome. There's nothing off the top of my head that I would have done differently.

ilikefreefood 2010:
PROFILE:
Type of Undergrad: Econ major from a top 5-10 Midwestern liberal arts college.
Undergrad GPA: 3.73/4, magna cum laude, distinction in major for senior thesis research.
Type of Grad: first semester of PhD microeconomics at Maryland
Grad GPA: 3.00/4.00 (B+)
GRE: 800Q 640V 5.5AWA
Math Courses: Calc II-III (A,B+), Linear Algebra (Pass), Statistics (A), Mathematical Structures (A-), Real Analysis (B, taken as a non-degree student at a local school Fall 2008), Probability (A, taken as a non-degree student at a local school Summer 2009)
Econ Courses: Principles Micro/Macro (A-,A), Intermediate Micro (A) Intermediate Macro (B), Econometrics (B+), PhD Micro Theory I (B+), pre-thesis seminar (A-), Ag. & Food Econ. (A), Development Econ. (B+), Econ. of Inequality (A), Econ. of Water Policy (B+), British Econ. history (B+)
Other Courses: A pass/fail seminar on game theory, a Poli. Sci. course on agent-based computer modeling (A)
Letters of Recommendation: 2 Econ. professors (liberal arts college profs but with Chicago/Stanford PhDs), including my thesis adviser who has previously stated that my thesis was one of the best he's ever advised. 1 Partner at my Econ. consulting firm with whom I've worked extensively on econometric analyses (PhD Cornell).
Where possible, a third Econ. professor (PhD Chicago).
Research Experience: ~3.5 years as an RA in a major Econ. consulting firm; I specialize in statistical and econometric analysis within my office.
Awards: Thesis award from state Economics association, thesis presentation award from state science association, college fellowship
for (non-research) work in development related to microfinance.
Research Interests: Development, environmental/resource economics, urban economics, general applied micro.
Statement of Purpose: Well-written but fairly standard; mentioned specifically my interest in development and applied micro fields.
Other: This is my second time applying, and I am reapplying to several schools with the additional Probability and PhD micro courses and a new letter of recommendation. I am deferred at Minnesota ARE from last year.
Applying to: Maryland, Maryland AREC, Duke, UC Berkeley ARE, Washington, Wharton Applied Economics, Michigan, Penn, Yale, Chicago, Michigan State, Northwestern, WUSTL, Georgetown, Texas, Boston University, UCSD, Cornell, Brown, UC Davis ARE, Illinois, Penn State, Virginia
RESULTS:
Attending: Boston University
Acceptances: Boston University (no $), U. of Washington ($), Michigan State ($ waitlist), Illinois ($), UC Davis ARE ($), Maryland AREC ($).
Rejections: Maryland Econ., Duke, UC Berkeley ARE, Wharton Applied Economics, Michigan, Penn, Yale, Chicago, Northwestern, Washington U. in St. Louis, Texas, UCSD, Cornell, Brown, Penn State, Virginia
No Response: Georgetown
What would you have done differently?
I would have taken more care to keep my grades in key courses consistently high in college to avoid a few potential red flags. I would have started my math education earlier and taken more classes as an undergrad. I would have worked only 2 years as an economic consultant and timed the business cycle to avoid applying in 2009 and 2010. I would have applied last year to a few schools that just missed my 2009 list (BU, Washington, and Illinois were all nearly on it), and potentially avoided the annoyance of waiting another year. I would have done more research to discount the advice of my advisors who said I would definitely get into schools on my 2009 list. All those things said, i feel that BU is really a fabulous program for my interests, and I am very, very excited to be headed there.