The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart. |
Most Recently Selected profile:
|
The data below comes from testmagic forums and shows accepted, waitlisted, and rejected applicants for 2010 for economics graduate school. Clicking on points in the graph above will make the most recent profile appear in the space below the graph.
| |
Acceptances:
tunedradio 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top liberal arts college Undergrad GPA: 3.89 Type of Grad: audited 1st year micro, 2nd year development Grad GPA: N/A GRE: 800Q/700V/6.0A Math Courses: Multivariate Calc (A-) Linear Algebra (A), Real Analysis (currently taking), Statistics (A), Diff Eq. in High School Econ Courses: lots, A's throughout, A+'s in intermediate micro and macro Other Courses: lots of political science / development / policy Letters of Recommendation: one very famous, one very good one (coauthor) but junior, another junior Research Experience: substantial; senior honor's thesis, presentations at four conferences, year of RA full-time, co-authored (yet to be published) less-technical papers with two professors (one very famous) Teaching Experience: TA for three semesters (one at graduate level) Research Interests: devo / trade SOP: good (but it doesn't really matter) Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: NSF, Yale ($), Berkeley ARE ($), Michigan Econ/Public Policy ($), USSD ($), Penn State ($), Brown (waitlisted $), Duke ($), UC-Boulder ($), LSE (Msc) Waitlists: Princeton PolyEc PhD Rejections: Harvard KSG, Cornell, LSE (PhD), MIT What would you have done differently? I actually applied last year with substantial less math and research experience and was accepted into two top 20 programs but no top 10 programs (and honorable mentioned on the NSF), so for those who are considering it, I found a year of RAing and a few more classes (and better recs) can really boost your admits.
Accepts: Acceptances: NSF, Yale ($), Berkeley ARE ($), Michigan Econ/Public Policy ($), USSD ($), Penn State ($), Brown (
Rejects: Rejections: Harvard KSG, Cornell, LSE (PhD), MIT
Waitlists: waitlisted $), Duke ($), UC-Boulder ($), LSE (Msc)
Waitlists: Princeton PolyEc PhD
| |
Rejections:
wobo82 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top 25 research university per USNWR Undergrad GPA: 3.33 (electrical engineering BS) Type of Grad: Top 100-ish research university without an econ PhD program Grad GPA: 3.87 (economics MA) GRE: 790Q/670V/5.0A Math Courses: Calc I through III, Diff Eq, Matrix/Linear Algebra, Math Stats, Stochastic Proc, Analysis Econ Courses: Micro Theory, Applied Econometrics, bunch of field courses Other Courses: Bunch of undergrad EE courses (lots of Matlab, some C++) Letters of Recommendation: Three from econ profs at grad school. (They were not alumni of the schools I applied to so where they got their PhDs was of no consequence.) Research Experience: Very insignficant. Teaching Experience: None. Research Interests: Development, broadly speaking. SOP: I liked it. Other: Male, international RESULTS: Acceptances: USC (fellowship), UMD AREC (RA), UMN APEC (fellowship), UVA (waitlisted for aid), GWU (waitlisted for aid), UW-Seattle (no aid) No news as of Apr 3rd (not that I care anymore): UNC-CH, Pitt, Purdue Rejections: Berkeley ARE, Brown, Georgetown, Vanderbilt What would you have done differently? Nothing. (Well, perhaps tried the PowerPrep tests.) My personal circumstances were such that I couldn't have done things differently. I do feel that I had overestimated the difficulty of getting in (to the departments I chose) but underestimated the difficulty of getting funding. But hindsight is 20-20. The biggest holes in my profile going in were: unknown grad school, bad undergrad record, lack of research experience, complete absence of a macro course (taking my first one right now). I feared the lack of macro would shut me out from the straight econ depts. All in all I am happy with my acceptance tally.
Accepts: Acceptances: USC (fellowship), UMD AREC (RA), UMN APEC (fellowship), UVA (waitlisted for aid), GWU (waitlisted for aid), UW-Seattle (no aid)
No news as of Apr 3rd (not that I care anymore): UNC-CH, Pitt, Purdue
Rejects: Rejections: Berkeley ARE, Brown, Georgetown, Vanderbilt
Waitlists:
peterB 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top public univeristy, excellent econ dept. Undergrad GPA: 3.1; 3.95 continuing ed. program Type of Grad: Grad GPA: GRE: math 780 verbal 780 Math Courses: stat and probability, real analysis, calc II and III, linear algebra Econ Courses: inter'l trade, monetary econ., 20th century econ. history, development economics, history of development economics, econometrics Other Courses: Letters of Recommendation: 2 econ people and one poli sci prof, no big names. Two of them knew me very well, and this must have helped a lot. Research Experience: summer RA Teaching Experience: Research Interests: development, IO, applied micro SOP: explained the circumstances for my low GPA, other than that pretty standard Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: UT, BU, Davis, UCLA, Riverside, Penn State Waitlists: Rejections: lots, NYU, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley ARE, UCSD, U Mich, Cornell What would you have done differently? If I had more time and money, I would have taken a grad-level micro course. Overall I feel really lucky to be in at UCLA; anyone else headed there?
Accepts: Acceptances: UT, BU, Davis, UCLA, Riverside, Penn State
Rejects: Rejections: lots, NYU, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley ARE, UCSD, U Mich, Cornell
Waitlists:
| |
Waitlists: |
|
Admit summary statistics:
| As submitted and recoreded from Test Magic: | There were 1 accepted out of 3 applicants.Of those accepted, average GPA was 3.89, average GREQ was 800.0.
|
No link to department posted statistics has been added, please let me know if these exist and I will add them. |
Links: Test Magic Econ Forums
econphd.econwiki.com |
|
|