The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart. |
Most Recently Selected profile:
|
The data below comes from testmagic forums and shows accepted, waitlisted, and rejected applicants for 2010 for economics graduate school. Clicking on points in the graph above will make the most recent profile appear in the space below the graph.
| |
Acceptances:
Prometheus_Econ 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top 50 public university Undergrad GPA: 4.0 GRE: 800Q, 610V, 5.0AWA Math Courses (all As): Undergrad Math: 3 semesters Calculus, two semesters proof-based Linear Algebra, Intro to Statistics, Probability Theory, Differential Equations, Intro to Topology, Analysis 1, Game Theory and Math. Programming, Proof Writing, Stochastic Processes (IP), Analysis 2 (IP) Econ Courses (all As): Undergrad Econ: Intermediate Micro, Intermediate Macro, Intro Econometrics, Game Theory, Experimental Economics Grad Econ: Quantitative Methods, Micro 1, 2nd year seminar in behavioral economics Letters of Recommendation: 1 math professor, 2 econ professors, from 3 different universities, all advised me on research, only one I took classes with Research Experience: Summer REU program, independent research in mathematical finance, honors thesis, gave 2 seminar presentations and 1 poster presentation Teaching Experience: Calculus 1 (undergraduate TA), lots of tutoring Research Interests: Microeconomic Theory, Financial Economics SOP: emphasized research experience, and explained how I became interested in economics, customized last paragraph Other: Applied for NSF (got honorable mention), got several departmental scholarships and awards in mathematics RESULTS: Acceptances: (with fellowship) NYU Caltech UPenn (after being waitlisted for funding about 2 weeks) Carnegie Mellon Tepper Johns Hopkins University of Michigan (external funding) Boston University (with TAship) Penn State UT Austin (without funding first year) Wisconsin UCSD Rejections: Princeton Stanford GSB Harvard Harvard Business School Northwestern Berkeley Waitlisted: MIT Stanford What would you have done differently? I would have applied to Yale as well, and perhaps applied to less safety schools.
Accepts: Acceptances:
(with fellowship)
NYU
Caltech
UPenn (after being waitlisted for funding about 2 weeks)
Carnegie Mellon Tepper
Johns Hopkins
University of Michigan (external funding)
Boston University
(with TAship)
Penn State
UT Austin
(without funding first year)
Wisconsin
UCSD
Rejects: Rejections:
Princeton
Stanford GSB
Harvard
Harvard Business School
Northwestern
Berkeley
Waitlists:
Mobil 2007:
Profile: GRE: 800Q/520V/3.5A TOEFL: 263/300, 4.5/6.0 GPA: I don't know how to translate: Undergraduate: 8.7/10 Master: 8.13/10 Classes: Math: Undergrad: Calculus I-II, Static Optimization, Lin Algebra, Int to Probability and Statistics. Grad: Real Analysis, Dynamic Optimization, Probability and Statistics Econ: Lots of undergrad, core grad sequence in Micro, Macro and Econometrics Electives: Money Theory, Development Economics, Advanced Theory Type of Undergrad: International Research Experience: Master's thesis Teaching Experience: TA for two grad Macro LORs: 5 LORs from professors who are based here in my home country. 3 are tenured professors (PhDs from Berkeley, Minnesota and UPenn) and two more junior (PhD from Chicago, PhD from a domestic university). SoP & Interests: It was just about my academic history, research interests (emphasizing the field in which each university is best) and professors I could work with in each of the universities. Other: International, Latin American, 25 yo. Interests: Macroeconomics, Money Theory, Development Economics RESULTS: Acceptances: (with funding): NYU Minnesota Columbia PennState (no funding): Rochester Rejections: Princeton UPenn Northwestern Yale No answer at all: Toronto What would you have done differently? Nothing, I guess...
Accepts: Acceptances:
(with funding):
NYU
Minnesota
Columbia
PennState
(no funding): Rochester
Rejects: Rejections:
Princeton
UPenn
Northwestern
Yale
No answer at all: Toronto
Waitlists:
Econ07 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: International, Top in the country Undergrad GPA: 9.3/10.0 Type of Grad: MSc GRE: Q800, V550, A4.5 Math Courses:Undergrad: Calculus I-III, 2 semester Lin Algebra, Probability, Statistics, Real Analysis Grad: Real Analysis II, Measure Theory, Statistics Econ Courses: Lots of undergrad, core grad sequence in Micro, Macro and Econometrics Electives: Contract Theory, Finance, Advanced Theory Letters of Recommendation: All domestic based. Two tenured, two junior. All had PhDs from top 7. Research Experience: MSc thesis in progress, Undergrad thesis Research Interests: Theory, Public Finance SOP: Discussed my background and interests RESULTS: Acceptances: Chicago(Ext fund), Columbia($), MIT($, not immediately), Northwestern (waiver, Ext fund), NYU($), Princeton($), Penn($), Yale (lots of $) Rejections: Chicago GSB-Econ, Stanford GSB-Econ, Harvard, Berkeley, Stanford What would you have done differently? Not have applied for the Fulbright. Focused more on the GSBs, emphasizing theory or not have applied to those. Advice: Relax. Focus on every aspect of the app (LORs, courses, research exp). Now, I believe this forum overemphasizes math (but, still, you should have Real Analysis). Having recomendants that are known by the Adcom seems to be important.
Accepts: Acceptances: Chicago(Ext fund), Columbia($), MIT($, not immediately), Northwestern (waiver, Ext fund), NYU($), Princeton($), Penn($), Yale (lots of $)
Rejects: Rejections: Chicago GSB-Econ, Stanford GSB-Econ, Harvard, Berkeley, Stanford
Waitlists:
| |
Rejections:
econchick06 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Large, not highly ranked public university Major: Economics Minor: Mathematics Undergrad GPA: Overall: 3.96, Econ: 3.98, Math: 3.85 GRE: 780 Q, 600 V, 5.0 A Math Courses: Calc I through III, Diff Equations (A+), Discrete Math (A+), Foundations of Math (Intro to Proofs) (A-), Matrix Algebra (A+), Linear Algebra (A), Probability (A), Advanced Calc (A, only A in the class) Econ Courses: Undergrad: Int Micro (A+), Int Macro (A), IO (A+), Urban/Regional (A+), Public Choice (A+), Math Econ (A), Econometrics (A+), Development Econ (A), International Economics (A), Money and Banking (A+) Grad (taken as an undergrad): Macroeconomic Theory (A), Mathematical Economics I (A-) Other Courses: Intro Stats I and II (A+, A+), Intro to Comp Statistical Packags (SAS) (A+) Letters of Recommendation:3 econ profs- 1 who I RA'd for and co-authored w/, 1 from grad macro prof, 1 from department chair. Research Experience: RA for 1 year for one of my professors/TA this Two sort-of publications (co-authored with professor,1 empirical paper in non-peer reviewed journal, and one study funded by a think tank) Completed a thesis-type paper (we don't have a formal thesis program), will be submitting for publication shortly (and I did submit this paper to the schools I applied to as evidence of my research aptitude) Teaching Experience: TA one semester Research Interests: mostly applied micro SOP: talked about my experiences with and passion for research, first para was tailored to each school Other: founded economics club RESULTS: Acceptances: full funding: Chicago (Will be attending ) Rochester Duke University of Maryland University of Virginia Johns Hopkins no funding: UCLA University of Pennsylvania (accepted off waitlist) Waitlists: Stanford Rejections: Harvard, Berkeley, UCSD, Michigan, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, NYU, Northwestern, MIT What would you have done differently? Hmm.. I think it turned out pretty well, I probably applied to too many schools but I am happy with the outcome and wouldn't really change anything. At least I don't have any "what ifs"!
Accepts: Acceptances:
full funding:
Chicago (Will be attending )
Rochester
Duke
University of Maryland
University of Virginia
Johns Hopkins
no funding:
UCLA
University of Pennsylvania (accepted off
Rejects: Rejections:
Harvard, Berkeley, UCSD, Michigan, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, NYU, Northwestern, MIT
Waitlists: waitlist)
Waitlists:
Stanford
Zoethor2 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Large public state university, no reputation in economics or mathematics. I will be the 3rd graduate ever from the economics department to pursue a PhD in Economics. Undergrad GPA: 3.93 overall, 4.0 economics, 3.85 math Type of Grad: N/A Grad GPA: N/A GRE: 780Q, 660V, 4.5A Math Courses: Intro Calc, Intro and Theoretical Linear Algebra, Intro Proofs sequence, 2 semester Theoretical Stats sequence, 2 semester Real Analysis sequence, Theoretical Complex Variables, Intro to DiffE Econ Courses: Intro and Advanced Econometrics, Intro and Intermediate Macro and Micro, Managerial, Monetary, International Trade, Experimental (Game Theory), 6 Independent Studies doing my own research (fun!) Other Courses: Majored in Psych, also, so a whole slew of those, but I doubt they hugely impacted my application. Letters of Recommendation: Very strong, but by relatively unknown professors. Two econ, one math. Research Experience: Did about 6 independent (though overseen by faculty) pieces of research, each culminating in a paper. 2 in experimental economics, several in economics of education, and one in game theory and conflict situations. Each paper was presented at a professional conference, mostly in non-student sessions. Teaching Experience: Was a TA for Johns Hopkins CTY for 2 summers for the Probability and Game Theory course. Research Interests: applied microeconomics/econometrics, experimental economics, economics of education SOP: I think it was reasonably strong. My advisors and I revised it quite a bit. Other: Triple-majored in economics, mathematics, and psychology. This meant a lot of semesters with 6 courses, as well as taking me 5 years to graduate. RESULTS: Acceptances: U of Maryland (no funding), UCLA (no funding), U Michigan (no funding), Georgetown (funded), Boston College (funded), CMU's Decision Science PhD (funded) Waitlists: Rejections: MIT, UPenn, Stanford, UC Berkeley, Caltech, Princeton, NYU (presumably), UPitt (presumably), GMU (presumably) (Presumably = I still haven't heard either way from these schools as of 4/12.) What would you have done differently? I would have applied to more schools in the top 20. When all my results were in, I was choosing between unfunded offers from top 20 schools and funded offers from schools ranked below 40. I wish I had looked into and applied to more schools in the 10-30 range, where it seems I could've performed well. As I said, pretty much no one from my school has applied to graduate programs before, so I had very little information to go on as far as my chances at top programs. Overall, though, I'm ecstatic about my results. I was expecting to get into GMU, UPitt, BC and maybe one other school. Getting into UMD, UCLA, UMich was a fantastic surprise.
Accepts: Acceptances: U of Maryland (no funding), UCLA (no funding), U Michigan (no funding), Georgetown (funded), Boston College (funded), CMU's Decision Science PhD (funded)
Rejects: Rejections: MIT, UPenn, Stanford, UC Berkeley, Caltech, Princeton, NYU (presumably), UPitt (presumably), GMU (presumably)
(Presumably = I still haven't heard either way from these schools as of 4/12.)
Waitlists:
peterB 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Top public univeristy, excellent econ dept. Undergrad GPA: 3.1; 3.95 continuing ed. program Type of Grad: Grad GPA: GRE: math 780 verbal 780 Math Courses: stat and probability, real analysis, calc II and III, linear algebra Econ Courses: inter'l trade, monetary econ., 20th century econ. history, development economics, history of development economics, econometrics Other Courses: Letters of Recommendation: 2 econ people and one poli sci prof, no big names. Two of them knew me very well, and this must have helped a lot. Research Experience: summer RA Teaching Experience: Research Interests: development, IO, applied micro SOP: explained the circumstances for my low GPA, other than that pretty standard Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: UT, BU, Davis, UCLA, Riverside, Penn State Waitlists: Rejections: lots, NYU, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley ARE, UCSD, U Mich, Cornell What would you have done differently? If I had more time and money, I would have taken a grad-level micro course. Overall I feel really lucky to be in at UCLA; anyone else headed there?
Accepts: Acceptances: UT, BU, Davis, UCLA, Riverside, Penn State
Rejects: Rejections: lots, NYU, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley ARE, UCSD, U Mich, Cornell
Waitlists:
grahamcoxon 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: B.A. in Economics from top university in my country (who has always placed students in top US PhDs) Undergrad GPA: Econ 28.73 / 30 (= 3.83 / 4.0 ); Overall 28.27 / 30 ( = 3.77 / 4.0 ) Type of Grad: 2 years long MSc in Economics from the same university Grad GPA: Econ 28.73 / 30 (= 3.83 / 4.0 ); Overall 28.73 / 30 (= 3.83 / 4.0 ) GRE: 790 Q, 520 V, 4.0 A Math Courses: Undergraduate: Mathematics (29/30; one year long course), Statistics and Probability (30/30), Econometrics (30/30) Graduate: Multivariate Analysis (30/30), Microeconometrics (28/30) Econ Courses: Undergraduate: Industrial History (30/30); Microeconomics (27/30); Industrial Organization (30/30); Macroeconomics (29/30); Organization Theory (28/30); International Trade (29/30); Innovation and Industrial Dynamics (27/30); Economic Policy (28/30); Technology and Economic Development (28/30); International Monetary Economics (30 cum laude / 30) Graduate:International Trade (30/30); Industiral Organization (29/30); Theory of the Firm and Corporate Governance (27/30); Business History (30/30); Economics of Innovation (29/30); Labour Economics (27/30); Public Economics (29/30). Other Courses: Undergraduate: German Language, International Financial Markets, Innovation Management, … ; Graduate: Knowledge and Innovation Management, Comparative Politics, Spanish Language, … Letters of Recommendation: associate econ professor and MSc thesis advisor (PhD UCLA); full econ professor and teacher of graduate labour econ (PhD NYU); associate econ professor and RA supervisor (PhD Northwestern); at least two of them are very very strong letters from people who know me well; two letter-writers are well-known economists and all publish on top economics journals. Research Experience: Honors MSc thesis; started to work on co-authored paper with my MSc thesis advisor (I don’t mention it in my application but he probably talked about it in his letter of recommendation); 3 months RA at Dept of Quantitative Methods of my undergrad/grad university; 1 year RA at CHILD (Center for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic Economics); Teaching Experience: 1 semester of Multivariate Analysis (graduate) Research Interests: Political Economy, Behavioral Economics, Microeconomic Theory SOP: nothing special, talked about reasons to pursue graduate studies in economics, research experience, research interests and future plans; used almost the same text for all universities; 2 pages research proposal outline added for European programs who asked for it (LSE, UCL, Oxford, UPF) Other: international applicant; TOEFL: 107/120; no application for external funding; honor roll student in both years of MSc; submitted everywhere MSc thesis as writing sample; at least other 10 (very very strong) students applied this same year for almost the same US top programs from my university (in this sense, this was a strong year for applicants from my country/university) RESULTS: Admitted : Caltech (w/ funding), BU (w/out funding), LSE MSc (w/out funding), Oxford MPhil (w/out funding) Waitlisted: Yale (not admitted in the end) Rejected: UCSD, Columbia, Berkeley, MIT, Princeton, Northwestern, Stanford, NYU, Chicago, Harvard, LSE MRes/PhD, UPenn, Oxford Dphil, Stokcholm School of Economics, Stockholm U Never got an answer : UPF, UCL What would you have done differently? I would say the standard “taken more math classes” or try the alternative version “taken more graduate econ theory classes”, but since I decided to try the path of an Econ PhD less than 12 months ago (when I had already taken all classes needed to graduate) this wasn’t an option. Maybe I should have applied to a more diverse set of schools (no European at all; some Business School or some lower-ranked school with programs/faculty in line with my interests like Stanford GSB, Northwestern MEDS, Rochester or Carnegie Mellon), because I acted clearly as a risk-loving individual (I didn’t overestimated my profile, though…I know my chances at top15 schools were thin, but just wanted to come all the way to the U.S. only if it was really worth). Anyway, in this case, it worked.
Accepts: Admitted : Caltech (w/ funding), BU (w/out funding), LSE MSc (w/out funding), Oxford MPhil (w/out funding)
Rejects: Rejected: UCSD, Columbia, Berkeley, MIT, Princeton, Northwestern, Stanford, NYU, Chicago, Harvard, LSE MRes/PhD, UPenn, Oxford Dphil, Stokcholm School of Economics, Stockholm U
Never got an answer : UPF, UCL
Waitlists:
whitewinghk 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: A School in HK, statistics major, no analysis Undergrad GPA: 3.66, first class honors Type of Grad: A school in HK, MA (Econ) Grad GPA: Grade A average GRE: Q800, V570, A5.5 Math Courses: no rigorous math courses, but some hard statistics courses, e.g. Statistical Inference A+, Stochastic Inference A+, Nonparametric testing (A+), linear model and forecasting (A-), Stochastic calculus (A-), Risk theory (A) Econ Courses: Intermediate macro (A+), Micro theory I, II (A+), Macro analysis (A+), Econometircs (A), International trade (B+) Letters of Recommendation: all strong, two from econ and one from statistics Research Experience: 2 year RA experience, working on trade and economic development of Mainland China Research Interests: Development and micro theory SOP: very general indicated my research interest and RA experience at university and United Nations RESULTS: Acceptances: Wisconsin ($), Boston University ($), MSU (no $), PSU (no $), UC Davis (no $) Waitlists: ever waiting, Uni. of Toronto and UBC Rejections: A long list, Minnesota, UCLA, NYU, Columbia, Maryland, Brown, OSU, Cornell What would you have done differently? I think I have tried my best or may be I should have applied to some applied econ programs as I have strong interest in development. Yet, I am happy with the results. Advice: Apart from Math, RA exp really helps a lot, it may make up weak math background. There would be lots of RA opp at any university. The job may be very simple like formulting Excel sheets, collecting data or plotting charts, yet it shines in your application. For international students, the process can be quite random especially for some are from unknown schools like me. Try to apply as many as possible, certainly you need to take into account money and how willing your referees are to write so many letters for you. Yet, if you can, try to apply as many as possible and do have a super safe one as a back up. I have seen a lot of Chinese students transfer to another school in one to two years. All the best and good luck
Accepts: Acceptances:
Wisconsin ($), Boston University ($), MSU (no $), PSU (no $), UC Davis (no $)
Rejects: Rejections: A long list, Minnesota, UCLA, NYU, Columbia, Maryland, Brown, OSU, Cornell
Waitlists: Waitlists: ever waiting, Uni. of Toronto and UBC
| |
Waitlists:
Nalfien 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: SUNY University Center Undergrad GPA: Econ (4.0)/Math (3.8) overall 3.84 Type of Grad: None Grad GPA: None GRE: 800/590/5.5 Math Courses: Multi Variable Calc A- , Diff Eqs A, Real Analysis A, Measure Theory A, Linear Algebra I B+ &II A, Computational A, Typical Math Major, Econ Courses: Grad Micro, Metrics. undegrad Math Stats, Metrics, Money and Banking, Computational, Interm Micro and Macro. A's Other Courses: Honors College Letters of Recommendation: 3 strong ones. One very very strong one. I really think the biggest reason I got in where I got in is because one of my recommenders put his neck out for me and called people to tell them about me. Research Experience: Year long honors thesis senior year. Teaching Experience: none Research Interests: Labor, Development SOP: Pretty nice... I think, didn't hear anything bad about it. two pages. Other: Used to go to departmental research seminars since sophmore year, got my face seen and showed an interest in research. RESULTS: Acceptances: Stanford ($)Yale ($)UCLA ($)UVa ($)UNC ($)..... no money: UCSDU,Mich Waitlists: UPenn,NWU,NYU Rejections: Princeton,Berkeley,Columbia,Duke What you would have done differently: I would have applied to less places. But there is no way I would have imagined I would have made out how i did. Very very fortunate.
Accepts: Acceptances:
Stanford ($)Yale ($)UCLA ($)UVa ($)UNC ($)..... no money: UCSDU,Mich
Rejects: Rejections:
Princeton,Berkeley,Columbia,Duke
What you would have done differently: I would have applied to less places. But there is no way I would have imagined I would have made out how i did. Very very fortunate.
Waitlists:
anukriti 2007:
Type of Undergrad: Masters in Economics from the best economics department in my country...history of students being accepted to Top 10 universities every year. Undergrad GPA: 69%. Ranked 3rd in my class. GRE: 800Q, 570V, 4.5 W Math Courses: Undergrad Math: Linear Algebra , Differential Equations, Topology, Real Analysis, Statistics, Partial Differential Equations, Game Theory, Calculus Econ Courses: M.A.Econ: Microeconomic Theory, Advanced Macroeconomic Theory, Basic and advanced Econometrics, Public Economics, International Trade, Forecasting Methods and applications, Economics of Regulation, Applied Consumption Analysis, Comparative Development Letters of Recommendation: All economics professors with Ph.D.'s from Yale, Cornell, Princeton. One of them working in a leading research institute in the US now. Research Experience: One year research with an international research organization in DC. Teaching Experience: Undergraduate Statistics for one year. Research Interests: Development, Health, Education RESULTS: Acceptances: Columbia Rochester Maryland Brown Wisconsin Waitlisted NYU Rejections: Princeton Harvard MIT Yale Cornell UPENN What would you have done differently? Nothing actually. I tried my best! vbrep_register("442973")
Accepts: Acceptances:
Columbia
Rochester
Maryland
Brown
Wisconsin
Rejects: Rejections:
Princeton
Harvard
MIT
Yale
Cornell
UPENN
Waitlists:
macrotime 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: Third world country (unknown to most) Undergrad GPA: 76/100 (math 90/100) Type of Grad: Third world country (well known top program) Grad GPA: 6/7 GRE: 780Q/500V/4.5A Math Courses: Calculus, Linear algebra, ODE, Dynamic prog., optimization, probability, econometrics Econ Courses: micro, macro, just as many courses an econ major should take Letters of Recommendation: 1 (MIT), 2 (NYU), 1 (Duke), 1 (UCLA) all of them really strong. 4 of them publish or have published in top journals, one less known. Research Experience: 2 years as an RA in a well known research institute, 2 years working in an interntional organization but in a more policy oriented position Teaching Experience: TA ecometrics grad level, TA international macroeconomics, instructor undergard macro, TA while undergrad macro, an intro courses to economics Research Interests: Macro, econometrics SOP: Honest, just described my research interests Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: Duke ($$) Georgetown (no $$) Rochester ($$) Waitlists: NYU Rejections: MIT Harvard Northwestern Columbia BU What would you have done differently? First, I would have resaerched more the universities I wanted to apply. Probably, that would have led me to apply to other set of universities. I would have worked less, and I would have taken more math classes.
Accepts: Acceptances:
Duke ($$)
Georgetown (no $$)
Rochester ($$)
Rejects: Rejections:
MIT
Harvard
Northwestern
Columbia
BU
Waitlists:
chappl 2007:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: small university in Switzerland, 215th on econphd.net Undergrad GPA: not easy to compute Type of Grad: same as undergrad Grad GPA: 5.73/6 GRE: 800Q, 610V, 5.5AWA Math Courses: Calc I-III, LinAlgebra, Mathematical econ (undergrad), Mathematical methods in finance (undergrad), Math and Statistics (MA-level), Stochastic Processes (MA-level) Econ Courses (MA-level): Adv. Macro I-II, Adv. Micro, Game theory, Public econ, Empirical Macro, Experimental econ, Econometrics (general), Time Series econometrics, Microeconometrics, Applied Econometrics, Theory of Finance I-II Econ Courses (undergrad-level): Macro I-IV, Micro I-IV, 3 Development econ courses, Labor, Trade, Monetary, Public, 2 metrics courses Other Courses: lots of undergrad management and law courses (compulsory in my school) Letters of Recommendation: 3 professors (1 Princeton PhD, 1 Swiss PhD, 1 German PhD), 1 head of research dept at central bank; all probably very positive Research Experience: 1 year RA at central bank Teaching Experience: none Research Interests: modern macro, international finance SOP: stated my background and research interests Other: I have no BA, only an MA, as a consequence of the transition of my school to the Bologna system. My MA transcript only contains grades for MA courses, translation of undergrad level transcripts all sent as individual sheets of paper. This might have confused some adcoms. RESULTS: Acceptances: Michigan (no $), Wisconsin (no $), Maryland ($), Rochester ($), JHU ($), BU ($), Virginia ($), UBC ($) Waitlists: NYU, ultimately rejected Rejections: Princeton, Yale, Penn, Northwestern, Columbia, Duke, Toronto What would you have done differently? I would have taken advanced math classes, like real analysis, topology, etc. As my school had no math dept, I would have had to take these at another school. I shouldn't have applied to my supposedly safety school (MA & PhD): Toronto; and should have applied to 2 more top 10 schools instead
Accepts: Acceptances: Michigan (no $), Wisconsin (no $), Maryland ($), Rochester ($), JHU ($), BU ($), Virginia ($), UBC ($)
Rejects: rejected
Rejections: Princeton, Yale, Penn, Northwestern, Columbia, Duke, Toronto
Waitlists: Waitlists: NYU, ultimately
|
|
Admit summary statistics:
| As submitted and recoreded from Test Magic: | There were 3 accepted out of 12 applicants.Of those accepted, average GPA was 4.00, average GREQ was 800.0.
|
From the Department webpage in 2010 (please send me a link if this is wrong!) |
Over the last two years, we have averaged over 800 applicants per year. We take 18-20. We make between 45 and 50 offers...The GREs typically set out necessary rather than sufficient conditions. We look for strong quantitative skills. We know that the GRE does not test those skills adequately, but if you score below some threshold (say, below 740) you either had a bad day or there is a problem with the mathematics background somewhere. Do we immediately condemn you on those grounds? Not at all, but if you have low GREs you will have to have that much of a stronger application elsewhere to make up for it. Conversely, if you have 780 or 800 don't sit back and relax. Many of our applicants achieve perfect scores, many more than we can admit. The rest of your application will be looked at very seriously. (Source) |
Links: Test Magic Econ Forums
econphd.econwiki.com |
|
|