The chart will appear within this DIV. This text will be replaced by the chart. |
Most Recently Selected profile:
|
The data below comes from testmagic forums and shows accepted, waitlisted, and rejected applicants for 2010 for economics graduate school. Clicking on points in the graph above will make the most recent profile appear in the space below the graph.
| |
Acceptances:
askua 2010:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: B.A. (honours)-Econ and Math, large Canadian University Undergrad GPA: Overall: 3.85, excluding first year: 4.0 Type of Grad: N/A Grad GPA: NA GRE: 780Q 580V 6.0AWA Math Courses (undergrad-level): Calc 1-4, Math stats 1-2, analysis 1-2, linear 1-2, analysis for econ, math for econ 1-2 (if this counts?); All A's or A+ Econ Courses (undergrad-level): Micro 1-4, macro 1-4, econometrics 1-2, IO 1-2, international trade 1-2, money and banking; All A's or A+ Econ Courses (PhD-level): IO (A) Other Courses: a few German courses Letters of Recommendation: 3 econ profs (1 Berkeley, 1 Minnesota, 1 Toronto) ... all taught me one or more courses. Research Experience: Barely any ... just one paper for the grad IO. Teaching Experience: tutor for 4 years Research Interests: applied micro (health, IO) statement of purpose: Preparation, goals, research interests Concerns: reputation of undergrad Other: RESULTS: Acceptances: UC Davis (no first year funding), UW Madison (no first year funding), UBC (PhD, $$) Toronto MA (doctoral stream, $$) Waitlists: None Rejections: Yale, Columbia, Michigan, Berkeley, Stanford, UCSD Pending: None What would you have done differently? I would have only gone to a different undergrad if I had known four years ago that I wanted to do a PhD in Economics. However, in retrospect, I might have tried to get more RA experience and done a double degree in Math and Econ rather than just a minor in math. Although I am pretty happy with my results given what type of a student I was in high school (not good). I am very lucky and not complaining. I think out of most of the top 20s, UBC and Madison are the best two fits for me so I think I was appropriately placed. Good luck to everyone in future cycles!
Accepts: Acceptances: UC Davis (no first year funding), UW Madison (no first year funding), UBC (PhD, $$) Toronto MA (doctoral stream, $$)
- Institution: UC Davis Economics
Decision: Admitted.
Notification Date: 2/15
Notified Through: E-mail
Posted on Grad Cafe: Yes
- Institution: Davis Economics PhD
Decision: Accepted
Funding: None for first year
Notification date: 2/15
Notified through: Email
Posted on grad cafe: Yes, 2/15
Comments: Relieved
- Institution: University of Toronto MA doctoral stream
Decision: Accepted
Funding: 15K (TA/fellowship) + 3K (summer) + tuition
Notified through: E-mail
Date: 3/8
Comment: And so the dilemma begins ...
- Institution: UBC Economics
Decision: Accepted
Notification date: 3/25
Notified through: Email and mailing
Posted on GF: Nope
Comments: Funding?
Rejects: Rejections: Yale, Columbia, Michigan, Berkeley, Stanford, UCSD
- Institution: Yale Econ PhD
Decision: Rejected
Funding: N/A
Notification date: 02/18/2010
Notified through: email to check website
Posted on Gradcafe: (yes or no) Yes, 02/18
Comments: Expected
- Institution: Yale Economics PhD
Decision: Rejected
Funding: N/A
Notification date: 2/18
Notified through: Website
Posted on grad cafe: Yes, 2/18
Comments: Expected
- Institution: UC Berkeley Economics
Decision: Rejected
Funding: N/A
Notification date: 03/02/2010
Notified through: email
Posted on GF: No
Comments: I wish I could say I didn't see this coming. Oh well.
- Institution: University of Michigan Economics
Decision: Rejected
Funding: N/A
Notification date: 3/3
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: No
Comments: Not exactly heartbroken, but not thrilled either. I guess you could say I am indifferent...
- Institution: Columbia University Economics
Decision: Rejected
Notification date: 03/04/2010
Notified through: Email to check website
Posted on GF: Yes, today
Comment: Getting used to rejection.
- Institution: Yale Economics PhD
Decision: Rejected
Funding: N/A
Notification date: 2/18
Notified through: Website
Posted on grad cafe: Yes, 2/18
Comments: Expected
- Institution: UC Berkeley Economics
Decision: Rejected
Funding: N/A
Notification date: 03/02/2010
Notified through: email
Posted on GF: No
Comments: I wish I could say I didn't see this coming. Oh well.
- Institution: University of Michigan Economics
Decision: Rejected
Funding: N/A
Notification date: 3/3
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: No
Comments: Not exactly heartbroken, but not thrilled either. I guess you could say I am indifferent...
- Institution: Columbia University Economics
Decision: Rejected
Notification date: 03/04/2010
Notified through: Email to check website
Posted on GF: Yes, today
Comment: Getting used to rejection.
- Institution: Stanford Economics
Decision: Rejected
Notification date: 3/11/2010
Notified through: Email, and letter.
Posted on GC: no
Comments: At least I get my money's worth. International postage!
- Institution: UCSD Economics
Decision: Rejected
Notification date: 3/22
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: Nope
Comments: Don't mind.
Waitlists:
48chec 2010:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad: B.A. Economics Latin American University Undergrad GPA: 3.5 Type of Grad: M.A. Economics Latin American University Grad GPA: 3.5 GRE: 800Q 570V 3.0 AWA Math Courses: Multivariate Calculus, Mathematical Statistics Econ Courses: Game Theory, Grad Micro, Grad Micro, Grad Econometrics Other Courses: Lots of History Courses Letters of Recommendation: 1 Berkeley who teaches at my Uni, 1 Michigan who teaches at my Uni, 1 MIT who teaches at an Ivy League Uni. Research Experience: R.A. since I was a third year undergrad. Last two years I was a full time instructor working on three papers. Teaching Experience: I have been a full time instructor for the last two years. I have been teaching Probability and Econometrics. Research Interests: Labor, information, applied econometrics. SOP: Made emphasis on my love for academia and my teaching and research experience. Other: Highest national grade on an economics exam. RESULTS: Acceptances: UCLA($), British Columbia Waitlists: UPenn, Brown Rejections: Stanford, Princeton, Berkeley, NorthWestern, Columbia, LSE, Michigan, Texas Austin. Pending: None What would you have done differently? I would have taken more math courses. I would also have taken more care of my GPA. I wish I had realized that I wanted to be an academic earlier in my undergraduate studies.
Accepts: Acceptances: UCLA($), British Columbia
Rejects: Rejections: Stanford, Princeton, Berkeley, NorthWestern, Columbia, LSE, Michigan, Texas Austin.
Waitlists:
Fantiki 2010:
Type of undergrad: 1. B.Sc. Finance from the best business school in a mid-size European country. In terms of financial research output the school is usually ranked as Top 10 European/Top 100 worldwide 2. (concurrently) B.Sc. Systems Science from the best university in the same European country Undergrad GPA: not obvious to translate, somewhere between 3.6 and 3.9, Top 5% Type of Grad: 1. M.Sc. Finance, same business school as above 2. (concurrently) M.Sc. Computer Science, same university as above Grad GPA: again hard to translate, I would say between 3.8-4.0, Top 5% GRE: 800Q, 570V, 3.5AWA Math Courses (undergrad): Introductory mathematics I (Calculus, Linear Algebra, Analytical Geometry) (B+/A-), Introductory mathematics II (Theory of continuity, Measures and Integrals) (A), Introductory mathematics III (Functional analysis, DE) (A), Introductory mathematics IV (PDE, IE), Introduction to optimization (A), Introduction to statistical inference (A), Time series analysis (B+/A-) Math Courses (grad): stochastic processes (A), optimization theory (B), mathematical investment theory (B+/A-), game theory (A), decision making (A) Econ Courses (undergrad): Introductory, Intermediate micro, Intermediate macro, International economics and finance, Money & Banking - A:s Other Courses: Finance & Computer Science (theory courses may be relevant), LSE summer school (A) Letters of Recommendation: 1. Finance full professor, thesis advisor, many A publications 2. Computer science full professor, thesis advisor, many A publications (in comp science) 3. Circulating weakly positive letters from semi-famous full professors in finance and economics Research Experience: 1. B.Sc. thesis in finance 2. B.Sc. thesis in systems science 3. M.Sc. thesis in finance - on decision making under information asymmetries in finacial markets (game-theoretical model+empirical evidence) 4. M.Sc. thesis in computer science - empirical part (as a chapter in an article) accepted in a top general interest journal, but the publication is not related to economics/finance (biology), I am a coauthor, but there are many others 5. RA for the computer science professor 6. Research internship at an internationally well-known company, also 1 paper from there, but published in a professional journal Teaching Experience: N/A Research Interests: Information economics, financial economics (theory + empirical) Statement of purpose: http://www.urch.com/forums/phd-economics/119180-post-your-statement-purpose-sop-here.html#post789723 Other: graduated in advance, some good awards (placed third nationwide in math competition, scholarship for publishing thesis etc.), strong technical skills (Assembler and similar hardcore stuff) RESULTS: Acceptances: Columbia finance ($) -> accepted this offer, LBS finance ($), UNC-CH finance ($), UBC finance ($), LSE finance (external EU funding) Rejections: Stanford finance, UCLA finance, Stern finance, Wharton finance, Haas finance, Kellogg finance, CMU finance, INSEAD finance, MIT economics, Penn economics (out of the waitlist) What would you have done differently? Probably not much, may be would establish better relationships with a couple of professors at my school. The application process to US universities is difficult for European applicants because information asymmetries are pretty large. I would recommend to establish good relationships with professors who have strong ties to schools you are applying (e.g. coauthoring, previous academic positions etc.). Also if you are coming from a less known educational system/school try to get short but informative course descriptions for the key courses as an attachment to your transcripts (e.g. course names like Math I-IV are not very helpful for admissions commiteas). I have received the feedback from some schools that these two things helped my case. Overall I did much better than I expected.
Accepts: Acceptances: Columbia finance ($) -> accepted this offer, LBS finance ($), UNC-CH finance ($), UBC finance ($), LSE finance (external EU funding)
- Institution: Columbia Business School Finance and Economics
Decision: Accepted
Funding: Stipend + Research scholarship (26k) + optional TA (4.5k)
Notification date: 03/02/2010
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: Yes
Comments: Well, me in a top 10 finance program... I just was jumping around my flat for probably 2 hours this morning.
- Institution: Columbia Business School Finance and Economics
Decision: Accepted
Funding: Stipend + Research scholarship (26k) + optional TA (4.5k)
Notification date: 03/02/2010
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: Yes
Comments: Well, me in a top 10 finance program... I just was jumping around my flat for probably 2 hours this morning.
Rejects: Rejections: Stanford finance, UCLA finance, Stern finance, Wharton finance, Haas finance, Kellogg finance, CMU finance, INSEAD finance, MIT economics, Penn economics (out of the
Waitlists:
manchild 2010:
Profile Type of Undergrad: BCom(Hons)/BSci in a top Australian uni Undergrad GPA: First Class Honours Type of Grad: Grad GPA: GRE: 800Q, 560V, 5.5AWA (only took once) Math Courses: Math major in Science degree. Upper level courses included math modelling, complex analysis, ode's, optimisation theory. Mix of High Distinctions, Distinctions (and a couple of credits) Econ Courses: Whole bunch of stuff. Honours level courses were IO, Labour, advanced micro, advanced macro, environmental econ. Other Courses: Some other science courses Letters of Recommendation: 1 Head of econ department, 1 thesis supervisor (known more in Europe than US) and 1 Cornell Phd. Research Experience: Honours thesis on EU Emissions trading scheme. Independent math research project on linear programming. 2 years working at a government economics bureau Publications: Nothing at time of applications. (one since then) Teaching Experience: Tutor for first and second year economics Research Interests: IO/environmental particularly emissions trading policies Statement of purpose: had no idea what to write, pretty general. [Made the mistake of leaving references to the United States in my letter to UBC! didn't seem to hurt too much] Concerns: In: UBC($$) Out: Northwestern, Michigan, Stanford, Berkeley, Harvard (Business Econ) (implicit)
Accepts: - Institution: UBC Economics
Decision: Accepted
Funding: Fellowship + RAship
Notification date: Unofficially 14 March, officially 17 March (Australian time)
Notified through: Email
Comments: My first admit after a bunch of rejections - feels good to finally get one, and gives me a choice other than my domestic Unis
Rejects:
Waitlists:
| |
Rejections:
winnie_econ 2010:
PROFILE: Type of Undergrad 1: Economics and Natural Sciences (G13 School in Canada) Undergrad 1 GPA (2 years): 1.9 , (Kicked out after 2 years for bad grades; too much partying) Type of Undergrad 2: Economics (Small Undergrad Uni in Canada with a good econ dept) Undergrad 2 GPA (2 years): 3.88 (had to get my sh** together) GRE: Will do before PhD admission Math Courses: Cal I, II (B, C,), Lin Alg I (F, then A+) Lin II (A-), Diff Eq (B+), Interm Cal (A-) Econ Courses: Inter Mic (B+), Inter Mac (D), Adv Mic I, II (A, A), Adv Mac (A), Metric I and II (A-, A) Letters of Recommendation: 3 from my Profs, who knew me well and about my amazing past ha ha Research Experience: None Teaching Experience: None SOP: Pretty usual Concerns: I was kicked out for bad grades ha ha! Will take Alberta 2 years and get top grades. I hope life will give me a second chance. I would love to hear from you guys about how I should proceed from here to get into Top 30 phd. RESULTS: Acceptances: Calgary MA ($$), Alberta MA (2 year Econ and Fin) Waitlists: None Rejections: UBC, Queens, SFU, McGill (all masters)
Accepts: Acceptances: Calgary MA ($$), Alberta MA (2 year Econ and Fin)
Rejects: Rejections: UBC, Queens, SFU, McGill (all masters)
Waitlists:
| |
Waitlists:
DerPumuckl 2010:
Undergrad: Top 3 in Germany, BA in Economics Undergrad GPA: 1.45/5.00 (the nearer to 1, the better) Exchange: UW, Seattle Exchange GPA: 3.86/4.00 GRE: 800Q/560V/4.5AWA Math Courses: 2 Math courses for Economists, 2 Statistics Classes, Game Theory Econ Courses: A lot including Micro I & II, Macro I & II as well as Econometrics I & II. Grad courses: None - even though advanced German courses are well above Econ 400 level. Letters of Recommendation: 3 from Profs with PhDs from Columbia, Chicago and Harvard. All should be strong. Research Experience: RA for one Semester (for one of my letter of recommendation writers). Teaching Experience: TA for one Semester. Research Interests: International Macroeconomics, Finance. Statement of Purpose: Good. Other: Applying for Masters. Concerns: Maybe not good enough grades. RESULTS (Masters only): Acceptances: Cambridge, UCL, Tinbergen ($$$) and Warwick Still waiting for response: SSE, UBC Rejections: LSE, Oxford What would you have done differently? I'm attending Cambridge for my MPhil - very happy!
Accepts: Acceptances: Cambridge, UCL, Tinbergen ($$$) and Warwick
Still - Institution: UWarwick MSc Economics
Decision: Accepted
Funding: None mentioned
Notification date: January 6th 2010
Notified through: Phone Call
Posted on Gradcafe: (yes or no) No
Date of Gradcafe post: (if yes)
Comments: Safety, hoping for better admits.
- Institution: Tinbergen Institute MPhil Economics
Decision: Accepted
Notification date: 03/05/2010
Notified through: E-mail
Posted on GF: No
Comment: Funded ($$).
- Institution: The University of Warwick MSc Economics
Decision: Accepted
Notification date: 01/04/2010
Notified through: Phone then email
Posted on GF: No.
Comment: Unfunded.
Rejects: Rejections: LSE, Oxford
- Institution: LSE MSc Economics (Research)
Decision: Rejected.
Notification date: 22/01/2010
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: No.
Comment: Pissed off.
- Institution: LSE MSc Economics (Research)
Decision: Rejected.
Notification date: 22/01/2010
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: No.
Comment: Pissed off.
Waitlists: waiting for response: SSE, UBC
Mutal 2010:
Institution: UCLA Program: PhD Economics Decision: waitlisted Funding: Notification date: 3/17 Notified through: E-mail Posted on GC: No Comments: A long shot for me. I'm even honored to be waitlisted there. Hoping for the best. Accepted: UC-Davis (TA $), USC ($$) (declined), TAMU (no words on $) Waitlisted: UCLA Rejected: UCSB, MSU, UMich, NYU, JHU, CMU, U Iowa Yet to be notified: UT-Austin, Georgetown, UW-Seattle, UBC
Accepts:
Rejects: - Institution: UT-Austin Economics
Decision: Rejected
Notification date: 3/29
Notified through: Email
Posted on GF: No
Funding: NA
Comments: expected.
Waitlists: - Institution: UCLA Economics
Decision: waitlisted
Funding:
Notification date: 3/17
Notified through: E-mail
Posted on GC: No
Comments: A long shot for me. I'm even honored to be waitlisted there. Hoping for the best.
Accepted: UC-Davis (TA $), USC ($$) (declined), TAMU (no words on $)
Waitlisted: UCLA
Rejected: UCSB, MSU, UMich, NYU, JHU, CMU, U Iowa
Yet to be notified: UT-Austin, Georgetown, UW-Seattle, UBC
|
|
Admit summary statistics:
| As submitted and recoreded from Test Magic: | There were 4 accepted out of 7 applicants.Of those accepted, average GPA was 3.65, average GREQ was 795.0.
|
No link to department posted statistics has been added, please let me know if these exist and I will add them. |
Links: Test Magic Econ Forums
econphd.econwiki.com |
|
|